Research reference
What a comparison can tell you.
A source-based matrix of capabilities, not a trading benchmark.
What we compare
Routing model, selected documented chains, API access, conditional MEV claims, fee model and a plausible use case. “Use-case fit” is an editorial interpretation of capabilities, not investment advice.
Two different chain counts
The profile lists selected chains established by documentation. DefiLlama’s tracked-chain count describes the adapter’s coverage and may include historical deployments. It must not be treated as the product’s complete current support matrix.
Volume has a boundary
We request DefiLlama’s aggregator overview through a same-origin PHP endpoint, cache it for 15 minutes and show its fetch time. Data older than one hour is removed. Adapter IDs are mapped explicitly; we do not substitute similarly named products. 0x family volume is not Matcha-only volume; LI.FI DEX volume is not its entire cross-chain business. Aggregators can route through one another, so totals can overlap.
No synthetic winners
We do not simulate provider quotes from pool prices. A meaningful live quote comparison needs identical contracts, chain, amount, time, fee treatment and executable route assumptions. The reference matrix is not that test.
Check workflow
- Identify the specific product and official documentation.
- Record the mode, network, access conditions and fee scope.
- Mark unresolved fields as unknown and keep their limits visible.
- Link the evidence, record its review date and accept corrections.
This publication compiles documented information. It does not provide investment advice, recommend trades, connect wallets or execute swaps.
